The
present blog isn’t my subject specific domain, yet, thought to write about this.
There was a discussion regarding -> whilst the Industrial Dispute covered the definition of Workman (S.2s) & the Employer (S.2g), it circumvented on defining an Employee (eg. let’s say Software Engineers). So, the way Workman is covered against Laying Off, Retrenchment etc.; Employees, as mentioned above, should’ve also been covered. For example, IT or Finance Sector Employees protected from being Laid Off or Retrenched, especially at the time of Recession or amidst the likes of Covid lockdown.
No
matter how noble the thought of covering Employees in the likes of Industrial
Dispute Act, there’s a glitch when they’re being compared to
Workmen. And that is, the Remuneration & Facilities given to Employees
compared to the defined Workmen, in which it’s presumed that such Employees
aren’t vulnerable when compared to Workmen; which made sense of then
Not including such Employees.
But
again, the Company Law should only include such Companies that can support or
provide Employees renumeration for at least 3-6 months, rather laying off
immediately, especially during recession or lockdown. If you can’t take care
for even 3-6 months, then you aren’t a company but a retail Shop.😊
© Pranav Chaturvedi
.png)
No comments:
Post a Comment