In
earlier Blogs, I briefly discussed about PCT, Madrid Protocol, UDRP
Arbitration, Designs, Copyrights. Continuing the trend, would discuss further
the relation between IP & Originality! And what constitutes it!
Was LIKE Button an Invention? Trend these days is, some contend that; An APP or WEB Portal, let’s say, a Social Media Platform, be considered an Invention too? Should it be? When they’re bifurcated to their own individual modules or pieces, then those individual pieces might fall under IP; mostly under Copyrights & Trademarks; but, Invention? The Process or Product itself? I Hope Not!
Definitions
of what’s invention, coined, novel are incorporated & pre-defined,
what & what can’t be patented, trademarked, copyrighted, copyrighted in design,
design patented; which can be referred & read in verbatim. For examples,
mere admixtures, re-arrangements, anticipation, prior existing, obvious in
general; aren’t considered as Novel. But how one deduces to conclusion? Should Software
be subjected to Copyrights only as they’re mere arrangements of written
functional modules, OR, the concept of it should be expanded to Patents?
Should such Products only be Patented & Never the Process? What then
about WWW? And then comes, was Gravity, Discovery or Invention? Do you Discover
Stars & Planets in the Cosmos or Invent it? Are Scientists &
Inventors & Researchers, all fall under same Category, or there’s huge
difference between all of them. One thing can be asserted that; We discern Inventions
in a very casual approach everywhere in the World; which shouldn’t have been
the case. Invention was, is & would never be, an Easy go Ride topic.
How tough it should’ve been? Consider for example, initial working models of Electricity,
Boat, Television, Airplane as Inventions. Contrary of which is trademark, wherein,
a good User & existence of it amidst traders & consumers, is enough
to build a contending part for concurrent use, even if in case of some
other proprietor of the same/similar mark already existing, on record or not. When
it comes to Copyrights, I already defined in my earlier Blogs. But, I say - Fiction
is more Original than anything written Subject Specific. For Example,
LOTR is more Creative & Original than anything which is Non-Fictional
or Subject Specific Books Written, for the reason, in case of Tolkien, he had
to be more creative compared to latter case, wherein, thousands of books
were/are already written & one had/has to just refer re-write re-arrange in
own words, EXCEPT, the Original Writer/Creator, who first
wrote/published the Original Work. And the more the work would be similar
to the ones already written, the more it would likely to be alike adaptation
or influenced by or simply copy pasting. The same goes with Designs.
Example – Perceptible Difference via Naked Eyes of designs of a Volvo
Cars & Volvo Trucks!
© Pranav Chaturvedi
No comments:
Post a Comment